Page 1 of 1

[AIRCRAFT] MiG-29 Swifts

Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2016 2:55 am
by NightRaven
Image
Image
I'm sure you guys have heard of the Swifts, the Russian aerobatics team using the MiG-29 Fulcrum. Their red, blue and white scheme has been synonymous with the team, bearing the shape of their namesake. What is less seen nowadays is their old blue, white and grey/red scheme they utilised back in 1991 all the way to 2003, when they changed to their current scheme.

This pack comprises of:
MiG-29A Standard Scheme bort numbers #40 to #48, excluding #45 and #47
MiG-29A Special Scheme bort numbers #57 and #58
MiG-29UB bort numbers #32 to #35
This was made as a "gift" to iqmal_97, for his work in the VFA-49 promo vid here: viewtopic.php?p=92775#p92775
As such, this pack also includes a fictitious version, bort #97 alongside his personal decal.

Credit: Umailbow for original MiG-29A/UB model
Repaints are always welcome, so long as credit is given.

Download: http://www.mediafire.com/download/3e06g ... swifts.zip

Re: [AIRCRAFT] MiG-29 Swifts

Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2016 8:52 am
by anthsco
Every time I say "That's it, not downloading any more planes, scenery, maps for YSFLIGHT!" something like this is released!

Lovely work!

Re: [AIRCRAFT] MiG-29 Swifts

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2016 12:17 am
by Scarecrow
Stellar work. Really excited about these.

Re: [AIRCRAFT] MiG-29 Swifts

Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 8:08 am
by NightRaven
Download link updated with aircraft bearing darker stripe at iqmal's suggestion.
Also included missing flr.dnm and WPNSHAPE variable for the UB aircraft.

Re: [AIRCRAFT] MiG-29 Swifts

Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 3:31 pm
by iqmal_97
Pic of updated retro paintscheme. Doesn't she look lovely?
Image

Thanks a bunch, NightRaven. Really loving these birds.

Re: [AIRCRAFT] MiG-29 Swifts

Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 5:09 pm
by u2fly
iqmal_97 wrote:Pic of updated retro paintscheme. Doesn't she look lovely?
As for me, something wrong with nose cone.

Re: [AIRCRAFT] MiG-29 Swifts

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2016 12:56 am
by NightRaven
>says something is wrong
>doesn't actually say what is wrong
>mfw

What's wrong with it?