Page 1 of 1

A380 Emirates flip a Challenger 604 midair

Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2017 5:14 pm
by Richard Vo
So I think y'all may have heard about this.
http://avherald.com/h?article=4a5e80f3&opt=0

An a380 Emirates (maybe A6-EUL), flipped a Challenger 604 (D-AMSC) midair :o . This cause by the wake turbulence from the a380. As the result, the Challenger 604 dropped from 35000ft to 25000ft above the sea level.

Also, in the source, I found that there are some smaller plane is also affected by the wake turbulence when flying nearby big aircraft like the a380.

Image
A6-EUL
Image
D-AMSC

Re: A380 Emirates flip a Challenger 604 midair

Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2017 6:05 pm
by Turbofan
Yeah, passengers sustained injuries as well, some of them serious. Apparently the aircraft was written off. This and other incidents might result in a re-write of the books on enroute separation minima for aircraft smaller than the 388.

Re: A380 Emirates flip a Challenger 604 midair

Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2017 8:22 pm
by Richard Vo
Turbofan wrote:
Mon Mar 20, 2017 6:05 pm
Yeah, passengers sustained injuries as well, some of them serious. Apparently the aircraft was written off. This and other incidents might result in a re-write of the books on enroute separation minima for aircraft smaller than the 388.
So sad to see D-AMSC has been written off... :( There are some engine failure as well.

Re: A380 Emirates flip a Challenger 604 midair

Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2017 10:49 pm
by Monoceros
So does this mean that all the Challenger aircraft will be "retired" like the Concorde because it is a danger to itself and other aircraft?

That's what irked me about the Concorde incident. The DC-10 that was dropping parts on the runway is still around while the Concorde was put out of service because it is dangerous when it was the DC-10 that was more of the problem.

Re: A380 Emirates flip a Challenger 604 midair

Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2017 11:00 am
by Richard Vo
@Monoceros nope. The Challengers are not dangerous. The solution, as @Turbofan mentioned above
Turbofan wrote:
Mon Mar 20, 2017 6:05 pm
This and other incidents might result in a re-write of the books on enroute separation minima for aircraft smaller than the 388.
.