B747 or A380?

From the American Heritage Dictionary
mis·cel·la·ne·a - pl.n.: Miscellaneous items or written works collected together.
Post Reply
Not1011
Rookie
Rookie
Posts: 72
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2018 2:16 am
Favorite Aircraft: Lockheed L1011, B100 King Air, DHC-6, Boeing 727
Location: Southern US
OS: Windows 10
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 8 times
Contact:

B747 or A380?

Post by Not1011 » Thu Jan 24, 2019 2:37 am

I chOOsE dA L-1011, dA trUE wIdEbOdy

Seriously, though. Which one do you prefer?
I did not sell very well, so Lockheed killed me. I'm the reason it doesn't make airliners anymore.

Random stuff:
1. They ain't "sharklets", like Turbofan said.
2. The Tu-114 should really go back into service in a redesigned form.
3. The L-1011 should also return, too.
4. My posts are repeatedly deleted on the AM3 forum.
5. Concorde must return!
6. Fegelein can never die, even when Hitler himself tries to kill him. (Downfall parodies)
7. Embraer should restart production of the EMB-110 and EMB-120, as those are my two favourite prop planes.

"LoL cArgO dOOr" -McDonnell-Douglas DC-10, my sworn enemy

User avatar
Welshy
Staff
Staff
Posts: 1966
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 4:53 pm
Favorite Aircraft: Spaceships I see when in a K hole
Location: In a K Hole
OS: My Mind
Has thanked: 216 times
Been thanked: 213 times
Contact:

Re: B747 or A380?

Post by Welshy » Thu Jan 24, 2019 11:48 am

Is there any debate? One is one of the most successful airliners of all time and one has been a compete flop
YSRepo Supreme Overlord
YSFHQ Elected Overlord
Overlord of VMFA-125 (CVW-171)
Previously Supreme Overlord of 323rd CAW
Friendly Neighbourhood Miscreant

If you see me post like this in a thread pay attention!
Image

User avatar
Neocon
First Class Membership
First Class Membership
Posts: 3823
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2011 5:01 am
Favorite Aircraft: Baron 58
Location: Tennessee
OS: Win 10
Has thanked: 1592 times
Been thanked: 1714 times
Contact:

Re: B747 or A380?

Post by Neocon » Thu Jan 24, 2019 9:47 pm

HA! Trick question. The correct answer is DC-3.

User avatar
Hornet
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 171
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2014 1:58 am
Favorite Aircraft: F/A-18F Super Hornet
Location: Republic Of Korea(South Korea)
OS: Window 8.1K
Has thanked: 294 times
Been thanked: 195 times
Contact:

Re: B747 or A380?

Post by Hornet » Thu Jan 24, 2019 11:03 pm

Neocon wrote:
Thu Jan 24, 2019 9:47 pm
HA! Trick question. The correct answer is DC-3.
DOUGLAS RULES
YS Flight Korea, Mad Shark Joint Force, Accu Poly
YS FLIGHT F/A-18 Super Hornet West Demo Team
President of MIRAE Airways

Feel free to contact me! Request repaint is always welcome.

User avatar
decaff_42
Staff
Staff
Posts: 3483
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2011 7:23 pm
Favorite Aircraft: SR-71 Blackbird
Location: Eastern United States
OS: Mac OSX
Has thanked: 597 times
Been thanked: 1248 times
Contact:

Re: B747 or A380?

Post by decaff_42 » Thu Jan 24, 2019 11:06 pm

Personally I'm partial to the 747, but I'm torn between the 744 and 748
Check out my website YSDecaff for all my tutorials and addon releases.
Visit by Bitbucket page for Python codes: https://bitbucket.org/decaff42/

Civilian Aviation Server Flight Log

Not1011
Rookie
Rookie
Posts: 72
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2018 2:16 am
Favorite Aircraft: Lockheed L1011, B100 King Air, DHC-6, Boeing 727
Location: Southern US
OS: Windows 10
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 8 times
Contact:

Re: B747 or A380?

Post by Not1011 » Fri Jan 25, 2019 12:05 am

decaff_42 wrote:
Thu Jan 24, 2019 11:06 pm
Personally I'm partial to the 747, but I'm torn between the 744 and 748
Go 748! I never REALLY liked the 744, although I do like all 747 versions. 748 is modern, too, and has more modern engines, compared to the A380's ancient looking engines.
Welshy wrote:
Thu Jan 24, 2019 11:48 am
Is there any debate? One is one of the most successful airliners of all time and one has been a compete flop
Yes, the A380 has been a complete flop, not only financially, but aesthetically, too. It has got to be the ugliest plane ever made.

Oh, and I choose L-188 and Model 10 Electras.
Hornet wrote:
Thu Jan 24, 2019 11:03 pm
Neocon wrote:
Thu Jan 24, 2019 9:47 pm
HA! Trick question. The correct answer is DC-3.
DOUGLAS RULES
DOUGLAS SUCKS, LOCKHEED RULES

Except for anything conceived before the merger with McDonnell. Oh, and Lockheed made a mistake merging with Martin Marietta.
Last edited by Not1011 on Fri Jan 25, 2019 1:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
I did not sell very well, so Lockheed killed me. I'm the reason it doesn't make airliners anymore.

Random stuff:
1. They ain't "sharklets", like Turbofan said.
2. The Tu-114 should really go back into service in a redesigned form.
3. The L-1011 should also return, too.
4. My posts are repeatedly deleted on the AM3 forum.
5. Concorde must return!
6. Fegelein can never die, even when Hitler himself tries to kill him. (Downfall parodies)
7. Embraer should restart production of the EMB-110 and EMB-120, as those are my two favourite prop planes.

"LoL cArgO dOOr" -McDonnell-Douglas DC-10, my sworn enemy

User avatar
Gunny
Business Class Membership
Business Class Membership
Posts: 3214
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2011 6:17 pm
Favorite Aircraft: Any thing with a prop.
Location: New Iberia.LA.
OS: Windows XP SP3
Has thanked: 570 times
Been thanked: 726 times

Re: B747 or A380?

Post by Gunny » Fri Jan 25, 2019 12:19 am

In my opinion, they're all just big ugly flying cylinders. Hasn't been an elegant airliner since the Conny went out of service ;)
Image[/align=centre]

User avatar
Turbofan
Senior Veteran
Senior Veteran
Posts: 1863
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 4:22 pm
Favorite Aircraft: Boeing 747, all variants
Location: Central OK
Has thanked: 972 times
Been thanked: 663 times
Contact:

Re: B747 or A380?

Post by Turbofan » Fri Jan 25, 2019 12:31 am

As if you didn't know my opinion... :D Have had the pleasure of flying in the -100, -200 and -400 variants. And those equipped with all available engine manufacturers! (GE CF 6-80, PW JT9-D and RB 211-524).
Check out my YSFS videos on my Youtube channel!
-----------------------
ATRP: When used in my posts refers to "Air Traffic Replay Project"
-----------------------
Avatar: Pratt and Whitney JT8D-219
-----------------------
My general rant: I will call them blended winglets, not Sharklets; There is no CEO, it's just simply put, an Airbus 319/320/321, or the 320NEO, 321NEO etc. I didn't land IN DAL, I landed AT DAL. On the other hand, I did land in Dallas.
-----------------------
Website GRID updated for 2019. New stuff in the works!
Turbofan's Terminal

Hi! I make average, undesirable, boring grey maps for YS Flight!

Not1011
Rookie
Rookie
Posts: 72
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2018 2:16 am
Favorite Aircraft: Lockheed L1011, B100 King Air, DHC-6, Boeing 727
Location: Southern US
OS: Windows 10
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 8 times
Contact:

Re: B747 or A380?

Post by Not1011 » Fri Jan 25, 2019 12:52 am

Gunny wrote:
Fri Jan 25, 2019 12:19 am
In my opinion, they're all just big ugly flying cylinders. Hasn't been an elegant airliner since the Conny went out of service ;)
Nostalgic much? The only ugly planes are Airbuses. Airbus can never seem to get aesthetic stuff right ever since the A310 was released and the Cold War ended. In the words of an Airbus designer: "Air does not yield to style." Yeah, Boeing proved you wrong 1,000x over. The only remotely good Airbuses are the A300, A310, A340, and A350. Forget the A380 and the thousand or so variants of the A320.
Turbofan wrote:
Fri Jan 25, 2019 12:31 am
As if you didn't know my opinion... :D Have had the pleasure of flying in the -100, -200 and -400 variants. And those equipped with all available engine manufacturers! (GE CF 6-80, PW JT9-D and RB 211-524).
Off topic, but the RB-211 isn't manufactured anymore. That kinda died with the 747-400. Neither is the JT9D. P&W should really bring back the JT9D, never mind the PW series.
I did not sell very well, so Lockheed killed me. I'm the reason it doesn't make airliners anymore.

Random stuff:
1. They ain't "sharklets", like Turbofan said.
2. The Tu-114 should really go back into service in a redesigned form.
3. The L-1011 should also return, too.
4. My posts are repeatedly deleted on the AM3 forum.
5. Concorde must return!
6. Fegelein can never die, even when Hitler himself tries to kill him. (Downfall parodies)
7. Embraer should restart production of the EMB-110 and EMB-120, as those are my two favourite prop planes.

"LoL cArgO dOOr" -McDonnell-Douglas DC-10, my sworn enemy

User avatar
Turbofan
Senior Veteran
Senior Veteran
Posts: 1863
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 4:22 pm
Favorite Aircraft: Boeing 747, all variants
Location: Central OK
Has thanked: 972 times
Been thanked: 663 times
Contact:

Re: B747 or A380?

Post by Turbofan » Fri Jan 25, 2019 1:04 am

Not1011 wrote:
Fri Jan 25, 2019 12:52 am
Off topic, but the RB-211 isn't manufactured anymore. That kinda died with the 747-400. Neither is the JT9D. P&W should really bring back the JT9D, never mind the PW series.
Right, I never said they're still being manufactured. I just said I flew in a 744 equipped with them ;) Still, plenty of RB 211-equipped aircraft flying around (BA 744s, AA 757s among others).

While I do share your passion for older engine types, efficiency is king these days. The JT9D was a great engine for its time, not the case now.
Check out my YSFS videos on my Youtube channel!
-----------------------
ATRP: When used in my posts refers to "Air Traffic Replay Project"
-----------------------
Avatar: Pratt and Whitney JT8D-219
-----------------------
My general rant: I will call them blended winglets, not Sharklets; There is no CEO, it's just simply put, an Airbus 319/320/321, or the 320NEO, 321NEO etc. I didn't land IN DAL, I landed AT DAL. On the other hand, I did land in Dallas.
-----------------------
Website GRID updated for 2019. New stuff in the works!
Turbofan's Terminal

Hi! I make average, undesirable, boring grey maps for YS Flight!

Not1011
Rookie
Rookie
Posts: 72
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2018 2:16 am
Favorite Aircraft: Lockheed L1011, B100 King Air, DHC-6, Boeing 727
Location: Southern US
OS: Windows 10
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 8 times
Contact:

Re: B747 or A380?

Post by Not1011 » Fri Jan 25, 2019 1:47 am

Turbofan wrote:
Fri Jan 25, 2019 1:04 am
Not1011 wrote:
Fri Jan 25, 2019 12:52 am
Off topic, but the RB-211 isn't manufactured anymore. That kinda died with the 747-400. Neither is the JT9D. P&W should really bring back the JT9D, never mind the PW series.
Right, I never said they're still being manufactured. I just said I flew in a 744 equipped with them ;) Still, plenty of RB 211-equipped aircraft flying around (BA 744s, AA 757s among others).

While I do share your passion for older engine types, efficiency is king these days. The JT9D was a great engine for its time, not the case now.
Then how is the CF6, an engine that's just as old as, if not older than, both of those engines, still in production and in use on modern aircraft? The 767 and A330 use it, and so does the Kawasaki C-2; all three are currently in production. General Electric is also planning on reengining some An-124's with the CF6, in place of the Lotarev D-18's, last I read.
I did not sell very well, so Lockheed killed me. I'm the reason it doesn't make airliners anymore.

Random stuff:
1. They ain't "sharklets", like Turbofan said.
2. The Tu-114 should really go back into service in a redesigned form.
3. The L-1011 should also return, too.
4. My posts are repeatedly deleted on the AM3 forum.
5. Concorde must return!
6. Fegelein can never die, even when Hitler himself tries to kill him. (Downfall parodies)
7. Embraer should restart production of the EMB-110 and EMB-120, as those are my two favourite prop planes.

"LoL cArgO dOOr" -McDonnell-Douglas DC-10, my sworn enemy

User avatar
Turbofan
Senior Veteran
Senior Veteran
Posts: 1863
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 4:22 pm
Favorite Aircraft: Boeing 747, all variants
Location: Central OK
Has thanked: 972 times
Been thanked: 663 times
Contact:

Re: B747 or A380?

Post by Turbofan » Fri Jan 25, 2019 2:17 am

Not1011 wrote:
Fri Jan 25, 2019 1:47 am
Turbofan wrote:
Fri Jan 25, 2019 1:04 am
Not1011 wrote:
Fri Jan 25, 2019 12:52 am
Off topic, but the RB-211 isn't manufactured anymore. That kinda died with the 747-400. Neither is the JT9D. P&W should really bring back the JT9D, never mind the PW series.
Right, I never said they're still being manufactured. I just said I flew in a 744 equipped with them ;) Still, plenty of RB 211-equipped aircraft flying around (BA 744s, AA 757s among others).

While I do share your passion for older engine types, efficiency is king these days. The JT9D was a great engine for its time, not the case now.
Then how is the CF6, an engine that's just as old as, if not older than, both of those engines, still in production and in use on modern aircraft? The 767 and A330 use it, and so does the Kawasaki C-2; all three are currently in production. General Electric is also planning on reengining some An-124's with the CF6, in place of the Lotarev D-18's, last I read.
GE kept adapting the engine to meet modern standards. While not used for the latest and greatest aircraft, the engine fits a niche for the aircraft you mentioned, and also fits well as an upgrade on some models. Right now, the latest variant is the E1, which is used on the 330. It also helps that some of the aircraft that are being powered by the CF6 have good order backlogs, which in turn ensures that the CF6s that have been ordered will continue to be produced.

UPS retrofitted its 727 fleet with Rolls Royce Tays before retiring them in the mid-late 2000s. If there's a case for it, the engine keeps getting produced.
Check out my YSFS videos on my Youtube channel!
-----------------------
ATRP: When used in my posts refers to "Air Traffic Replay Project"
-----------------------
Avatar: Pratt and Whitney JT8D-219
-----------------------
My general rant: I will call them blended winglets, not Sharklets; There is no CEO, it's just simply put, an Airbus 319/320/321, or the 320NEO, 321NEO etc. I didn't land IN DAL, I landed AT DAL. On the other hand, I did land in Dallas.
-----------------------
Website GRID updated for 2019. New stuff in the works!
Turbofan's Terminal

Hi! I make average, undesirable, boring grey maps for YS Flight!

Not1011
Rookie
Rookie
Posts: 72
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2018 2:16 am
Favorite Aircraft: Lockheed L1011, B100 King Air, DHC-6, Boeing 727
Location: Southern US
OS: Windows 10
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 8 times
Contact:

Re: B747 or A380?

Post by Not1011 » Fri Jan 25, 2019 3:07 am

Turbofan wrote:
Fri Jan 25, 2019 2:17 am
Not1011 wrote:
Fri Jan 25, 2019 1:47 am
Turbofan wrote:
Fri Jan 25, 2019 1:04 am
Right, I never said they're still being manufactured. I just said I flew in a 744 equipped with them ;) Still, plenty of RB 211-equipped aircraft flying around (BA 744s, AA 757s among others).

While I do share your passion for older engine types, efficiency is king these days. The JT9D was a great engine for its time, not the case now.
Then how is the CF6, an engine that's just as old as, if not older than, both of those engines, still in production and in use on modern aircraft? The 767 and A330 use it, and so does the Kawasaki C-2; all three are currently in production. General Electric is also planning on reengining some An-124's with the CF6, in place of the Lotarev D-18's, last I read.
GE kept adapting the engine to meet modern standards. While not used for the latest and greatest aircraft, the engine fits a niche for the aircraft you mentioned, and also fits well as an upgrade on some models. Right now, the latest variant is the E1, which is used on the 330. It also helps that some of the aircraft that are being powered by the CF6 have good order backlogs, which in turn ensures that the CF6s that have been ordered will continue to be produced.

UPS retrofitted its 727 fleet with Rolls Royce Tays before retiring them in the mid-late 2000s. If there's a case for it, the engine keeps getting produced.
The JT9D and RB211 are high-bypass turbofans too. It'd be logical to at least try to update them. Oh, and the JT8D is still offered, heck, maybe even still in production, for replacing the JT3Ds on the Boeing 707 fleets, and it's advertised as being half the cost of the competing CFM56.
I did not sell very well, so Lockheed killed me. I'm the reason it doesn't make airliners anymore.

Random stuff:
1. They ain't "sharklets", like Turbofan said.
2. The Tu-114 should really go back into service in a redesigned form.
3. The L-1011 should also return, too.
4. My posts are repeatedly deleted on the AM3 forum.
5. Concorde must return!
6. Fegelein can never die, even when Hitler himself tries to kill him. (Downfall parodies)
7. Embraer should restart production of the EMB-110 and EMB-120, as those are my two favourite prop planes.

"LoL cArgO dOOr" -McDonnell-Douglas DC-10, my sworn enemy

Not1011
Rookie
Rookie
Posts: 72
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2018 2:16 am
Favorite Aircraft: Lockheed L1011, B100 King Air, DHC-6, Boeing 727
Location: Southern US
OS: Windows 10
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 8 times
Contact:

Re: B747 or A380?

Post by Not1011 » Fri Jan 25, 2019 3:08 am

OP: The 747 will never die, while the A380 will likely be axed by Airbus within the next decade.
I did not sell very well, so Lockheed killed me. I'm the reason it doesn't make airliners anymore.

Random stuff:
1. They ain't "sharklets", like Turbofan said.
2. The Tu-114 should really go back into service in a redesigned form.
3. The L-1011 should also return, too.
4. My posts are repeatedly deleted on the AM3 forum.
5. Concorde must return!
6. Fegelein can never die, even when Hitler himself tries to kill him. (Downfall parodies)
7. Embraer should restart production of the EMB-110 and EMB-120, as those are my two favourite prop planes.

"LoL cArgO dOOr" -McDonnell-Douglas DC-10, my sworn enemy

User avatar
Welshy
Staff
Staff
Posts: 1966
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 4:53 pm
Favorite Aircraft: Spaceships I see when in a K hole
Location: In a K Hole
OS: My Mind
Has thanked: 216 times
Been thanked: 213 times
Contact:

Re: B747 or A380?

Post by Welshy » Fri Jan 25, 2019 3:25 am

Gunny wrote:
Fri Jan 25, 2019 12:19 am
In my opinion, they're all just big ugly flying cylinders. Hasn't been an elegant airliner since the Conny went out of service ;)
I have to disagree Gunny. Concorde being the obvious example and I'm partial to the Trident, VC10, ATP and Heron although that might be my love of British design.
Not1011 wrote:
Fri Jan 25, 2019 3:07 am
Turbofan wrote:
Fri Jan 25, 2019 2:17 am
Not1011 wrote:
Fri Jan 25, 2019 1:47 am
Then how is the CF6, an engine that's just as old as, if not older than, both of those engines, still in production and in use on modern aircraft? The 767 and A330 use it, and so does the Kawasaki C-2; all three are currently in production. General Electric is also planning on reengining some An-124's with the CF6, in place of the Lotarev D-18's, last I read.
GE kept adapting the engine to meet modern standards. While not used for the latest and greatest aircraft, the engine fits a niche for the aircraft you mentioned, and also fits well as an upgrade on some models. Right now, the latest variant is the E1, which is used on the 330. It also helps that some of the aircraft that are being powered by the CF6 have good order backlogs, which in turn ensures that the CF6s that have been ordered will continue to be produced.

UPS retrofitted its 727 fleet with Rolls Royce Tays before retiring them in the mid-late 2000s. If there's a case for it, the engine keeps getting produced.
The JT9D and RB211 are high-bypass turbofans too. It'd be logical to at least try to update them. Oh, and the JT8D is still offered, heck, maybe even still in production, for replacing the JT3Ds on the Boeing 707 fleets, and it's advertised as being half the cost of the competing CFM56.
Where do I start? The RB211 killed Rolls, they failed to get the scaled down RB206 I think its called into service and the Trent family was already incoming. Not being in a family doomed it from the start, MGTs are essential profit earners, as are generator units, it's nieve to think it comes down to airliners. There is next to no 707 aircraft looking to be reengined on scale, most have been done and now aircraft such as the E-3 are being replaced soon, starting with RAF Wedgetails. Also the A330 is no longer in production, the neo is, big difference! Also the civil 767 line is closed to orders and will not be reopened and the C-2 will not sell more than 80 units.
YSRepo Supreme Overlord
YSFHQ Elected Overlord
Overlord of VMFA-125 (CVW-171)
Previously Supreme Overlord of 323rd CAW
Friendly Neighbourhood Miscreant

If you see me post like this in a thread pay attention!
Image

User avatar
Turbofan
Senior Veteran
Senior Veteran
Posts: 1863
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 4:22 pm
Favorite Aircraft: Boeing 747, all variants
Location: Central OK
Has thanked: 972 times
Been thanked: 663 times
Contact:

Re: B747 or A380?

Post by Turbofan » Fri Jan 25, 2019 3:27 am

^The 330 is very much in production ;) Albeit with weaker demand.
Check out my YSFS videos on my Youtube channel!
-----------------------
ATRP: When used in my posts refers to "Air Traffic Replay Project"
-----------------------
Avatar: Pratt and Whitney JT8D-219
-----------------------
My general rant: I will call them blended winglets, not Sharklets; There is no CEO, it's just simply put, an Airbus 319/320/321, or the 320NEO, 321NEO etc. I didn't land IN DAL, I landed AT DAL. On the other hand, I did land in Dallas.
-----------------------
Website GRID updated for 2019. New stuff in the works!
Turbofan's Terminal

Hi! I make average, undesirable, boring grey maps for YS Flight!

Not1011
Rookie
Rookie
Posts: 72
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2018 2:16 am
Favorite Aircraft: Lockheed L1011, B100 King Air, DHC-6, Boeing 727
Location: Southern US
OS: Windows 10
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 8 times
Contact:

Re: B747 or A380?

Post by Not1011 » Fri Jan 25, 2019 8:17 pm

OP: The GP7000 turbofan looks like an enlarged JT8D to me.

Engine discussion going on: Also, manufacturers should really start making planes with the Allison T56 again, the civil variant (501). Turbofans have too much dominance nowadays, and the PW100 series has nothing on the T56, and neither does the AE2100.

Oh, and the 767 is still produced as a civil plane, just only as a cargo plane. They should put the passenger version back into production as an entry level widebody, because the 787 seems too expensive.
I did not sell very well, so Lockheed killed me. I'm the reason it doesn't make airliners anymore.

Random stuff:
1. They ain't "sharklets", like Turbofan said.
2. The Tu-114 should really go back into service in a redesigned form.
3. The L-1011 should also return, too.
4. My posts are repeatedly deleted on the AM3 forum.
5. Concorde must return!
6. Fegelein can never die, even when Hitler himself tries to kill him. (Downfall parodies)
7. Embraer should restart production of the EMB-110 and EMB-120, as those are my two favourite prop planes.

"LoL cArgO dOOr" -McDonnell-Douglas DC-10, my sworn enemy

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest