Project X
- flyer17
- Contributor
- Posts: 210
- Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 6:38 pm
- Favorite Aircraft: boeing 787 dreamliner
- Location: probably no where
- OS: windows 7
- Has thanked: 19 times
- Been thanked: 199 times
- Contact:
Project X
any time yo think thath we need an aircraft that have an smooth landing and a very very fast flight (almost impossible)
i have the solution an vtol
too is in wip but i will have the pictures soon
PD:the airplane will be designed for comercial flights only
PD2: sorry for my bad english
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 528
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2015 8:19 pm
- Favorite Aircraft: A380, JAS-39
- Location: Sweden
- OS: Windows 10
- Has thanked: 320 times
- Been thanked: 115 times
- Contact:
Re: Project X
Your project sounds very interesting. Good luck
By any chance if you have Instagram, please drop a follow on @vhaq_aero and if you have Twitter, please drop a follow on @vhaq_aero. Appreciate that!
- flyer17
- Contributor
- Posts: 210
- Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 6:38 pm
- Favorite Aircraft: boeing 787 dreamliner
- Location: probably no where
- OS: windows 7
- Has thanked: 19 times
- Been thanked: 199 times
- Contact:
Re: Project X
here are the first images of the project
sorry i don't know how to load images from my pc
Ah Quan Vo you can left me the url of you airline thanks
- Greenhorn
- Veteran
- Posts: 588
- Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 1:05 pm
- Favorite Aircraft: A320, B737, F-5E, Gripen, Mirage F-1
- Location: Cooped up in 1788
- OS: Windows 10
- Has thanked: 310 times
- Been thanked: 389 times
- Contact:
Re: Project X
(img)insert link here(/img) but with the () replaced with [ ] instead
My rough sketch of a possible entry to Project X.
Triggered easily, do not startle
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 528
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2015 8:19 pm
- Favorite Aircraft: A380, JAS-39
- Location: Sweden
- OS: Windows 10
- Has thanked: 320 times
- Been thanked: 115 times
- Contact:
Re: Project X
Great to see you are interest in my virtual airlines Here is the link: https://www.facebook.com/World-Airlines ... NE&fref=nf
Good luck
By any chance if you have Instagram, please drop a follow on @vhaq_aero and if you have Twitter, please drop a follow on @vhaq_aero. Appreciate that!
- Neocon
- First Class Membership
- Posts: 3955
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2011 5:01 am
- Favorite Aircraft: Baron 58
- Location: Tennessee
- OS: Win 10
- Has thanked: 1769 times
- Been thanked: 1810 times
- Contact:
Re: Project X
- flyer17
- Contributor
- Posts: 210
- Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 6:38 pm
- Favorite Aircraft: boeing 787 dreamliner
- Location: probably no where
- OS: windows 7
- Has thanked: 19 times
- Been thanked: 199 times
- Contact:
Re: Project X
no really is better than this but near
also the wings are downer and the cockpit is more like the concorde cockpit
like this: the engine near the cockpit is for balance on the landing
make this only takes me 23 min because i'm using wings 3d
Re: Project X
- flyer17
- Contributor
- Posts: 210
- Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 6:38 pm
- Favorite Aircraft: boeing 787 dreamliner
- Location: probably no where
- OS: windows 7
- Has thanked: 19 times
- Been thanked: 199 times
- Contact:
Re: Project X
the engines is not turbofan is an rocket engine of low potence
but anyhow the fuel capability is not so large and the fuel consumption is too many bigger
i will end this problem on the version 2
also it now have name: the AMANTHIS-1
for now its recomended only for travels of less than 400 miles in case of the travel is larger please land and refuel before still flying without enough fuel
Re: Project X
problem with using rockets is you'll melt pretty much every single runway and landing pad on the planet, the heat generated by them is way too high. might i suggest using a single lift fan in the nose with twin ducted fans on the wings? much more efficient for VTOL operations and they don't generate much drag when in flight if you conceal them with doors. that way you can use standard turbofans for cruise flight. ducted fans are also much lighter when compared to lugging a rocket and all its fuel and oxidizer aroundflyer17 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 29, 2017 6:02 pm explanation: the air entries is for oxigen for persons
the engines is not turbofan is an rocket engine of low potence
but anyhow the fuel capability is not so large and the fuel consumption is too many bigger
i will end this problem on the version 2
also it now have name: the AMANTHIS-1
for now its recomended only for travels of less than 400 miles in case of the travel is larger please land and refuel before still flying without enough fuel
- flyer17
- Contributor
- Posts: 210
- Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 6:38 pm
- Favorite Aircraft: boeing 787 dreamliner
- Location: probably no where
- OS: windows 7
- Has thanked: 19 times
- Been thanked: 199 times
- Contact:
Re: Project X
no problem im working now on the 2nd version and in an specialized tipe of airportSwift wrote: ↑Wed Mar 29, 2017 6:08 pm problem with using rockets is you'll melt pretty much every single runway and landing pad on the planet, the heat generated by them is way too high. might i suggest using a single lift fan in the nose with twin ducted fans on the wings? much more efficient for VTOL operations and they don't generate much drag when in flight if you conceal them with doors. that way you can use standard turbofans for cruise flight. ducted fans are also much lighter when compared to lugging a rocket and all its fuel and oxidizer around
and the fuel is loaded on the wings and the tail
- fikrikawakibi
- Contributor
- Posts: 167
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2017 7:18 am
- Favorite Aircraft: Zephyr HAPS, ScanEagle, Citation X+, A340, 成都 歼-20
- Location: Bogor
- OS: Windows
- Has thanked: 594 times
- Been thanked: 45 times
- Contact:
Re: Project X
- flyer17
- Contributor
- Posts: 210
- Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 6:38 pm
- Favorite Aircraft: boeing 787 dreamliner
- Location: probably no where
- OS: windows 7
- Has thanked: 19 times
- Been thanked: 199 times
- Contact:
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests