Page 1 of 1

Spring 2016 preliminary election results

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 4:03 am
by YSFHQ
Dear YSFHQ Community,

The Spring 2016 election results are in! However during the review of these results, suspicious IP addresses and user emails were noted to have cast an excessive amount of votes. The admins of YSFHQ want a fair and accurate vote just as much as you, the members.

To this end, we will be carefully looking at the votes and ensure that the the final vote counts reflect only the votes cast by the members of YSFHQ and not sockpuppets.

Here are the votes as they stand now…
Image
Image

By Saturday at 6pm the votes will be reviewed and those that are discarded shall be specifically listed and why that vote does not count. Then the final poll results that reflect the true vote of the community will be tallied and presented. We will present all this in a separate topic (to be linked). The transition of community leadership is an important event and we the admin team owe it to each and every member to do the right thing.

Ballot stuffing is something abhorrent and seen by us as an attack on the integrity of the community. We ask for your patience as we get this right.

Thank you,
YSFHQ Admins

Re: Spring 2016 preliminary election results

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 6:23 pm
by plunderbird
Heck, this just isn't the only site that it happens on. Stupid idea I know, to get friends to vote for you, so you can win.

Re: Spring 2016 preliminary election results

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 10:13 pm
by KDFire
YSFHQ wrote:...during the review of these results, suspicious IP addresses and user emails were noted to have cast an excessive amount of votes. The admins of YSFHQ want a fair and accurate vote just as much as you, the members.

To this end, we will be carefully looking at the votes and ensure that the the final vote counts reflect only the votes cast by the members of YSFHQ and not sockpuppets.

Ballot stuffing is something abhorrent and seen by us as an attack on the integrity of the community. We ask for your patience as we get this right.
Big surprise...

This doesn't sound familiar at all, does it? No?

Oh, yes it does. A certain 444-CV commander turned HQ staff leader who shall not be named did the same thing. Does it even come as a surprise that the oh-so-trustworthy Doomsday is possibly doing the same thing? No. It doesn't. It's the 171st.

Every time something like this happens, it gives me more and more reason to lose faith in this site, as well as more of a reason to be annoyed at the person responsible. And given how annoyed I already am at the 171st, this helps very little. So if you'll excuse me, I'm gonna go back to the front in silence and keep counting...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aXhjp85UNJI

Re: Spring 2016 preliminary election results

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 10:22 pm
by Margatroid
KDFire wrote:Big surprise...

This doesn't sound familiar at all, does it? No?

Oh, yes it does. A certain 444-CV commander turned HQ staff leader who shall not be named did the same thing. Does it even come as a surprise that the oh-so-trustworthy Doomsday is possibly doing the same thing? No. It doesn't. It's the 171st.

Every time something like this happens, it gives me more and more reason to lose faith in this site, as well as more of a reason to be annoyed at the person responsible. And given how annoyed I already am at the 171st, this helps very little. So if you'll excuse me, I'm gonna go back to the front in silence and keep counting...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aXhjp85UNJI
Image

Re: Spring 2016 preliminary election results

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 10:24 pm
by Capt K
KDFire wrote:
Big surprise...

This doesn't sound familiar at all, does it? No?

Oh, yes it does. A certain 444-CV commander turned HQ staff leader who shall not be named did the same thing. Does it even come as a surprise that the oh-so-trustworthy Doomsday is possibly doing the same thing? No. It doesn't. It's the 171st.

Every time something like this happens, it gives me more and more reason to lose faith in this site, as well as more of a reason to be annoyed at the person responsible. And given how annoyed I already am at the 171st, this helps very little. So if you'll excuse me, I'm gonna go back to the front in silence and keep counting...

You are one dense motherfucker.

Re: Spring 2016 preliminary election results

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 10:26 pm
by KDFire
Thanks for proving my point, Sent. Try actually coming up with an argument that presents anything with your next post.
Capt K wrote:You are one dense motherfucker.
And who are you? One of the sockpuppets that was mentioned here, no doubt.

You can call me dense. I call it telling it like it is, and we need more of that.

Re: Spring 2016 preliminary election results

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 10:30 pm
by Capt K
KDFire wrote:You can call me dense. I call it telling it like it is, and we need more of that.
I call it being the hairiest fucking spud to ever roll across the earth you mongoloid.

Re: Spring 2016 preliminary election results

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 10:32 pm
by Margatroid
I didn't prove anything for you at all.

I'm just laughing at how absolutely fucking stupid your post was.

Re: Spring 2016 preliminary election results

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 10:35 pm
by MD5Ray01
Capt K wrote:I call it being the hairiest fucking spud to ever roll across the earth you mongoloid.
Margatroid wrote:I didn't prove anything for you at all.

I'm just laughing at how absolutely fucking stupid your post was.
And here I've wondered why I choose to stay in lurker mode on this site, only for the two of you to come out and show me the reason.
Sent, I would have expected better from somebody who was an admin.

Re: Spring 2016 preliminary election results

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 10:36 pm
by Capt K
MD5Ray01 wrote:And here I've wondered why I choose to stay in lurker mode on this site, only for the two of you to come out and show me the reason.

and HQ is better off for it.

Re: Spring 2016 preliminary election results

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 10:37 pm
by KDFire
Margatroid wrote:I didn't prove anything for you at all.

I'm just laughing at how absolutely fucking stupid your post was.
Only you and your sock friend would call it stupid, 171st F-16 Commando. If you're going to deny that you all have a terrible track record when it comes to being admins, think twice before you spew that lie.

Re: Spring 2016 preliminary election results

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 10:38 pm
by MD5Ray01
Capt K wrote:
MD5Ray01 wrote:And here I've wondered why I choose to stay in lurker mode on this site, only for the two of you to come out and show me the reason.

and HQ is better of for it.
I would say otherwise. Considering your very poor behavior as of lately, I'm surprised you haven't had the hammer of banning applied yet.

And with this, I take my leave of this thread and go back to being in the shadows.

Re: Spring 2016 preliminary election results

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 10:40 pm
by Capt K
MD5Ray01 wrote:
Capt K wrote:
MD5Ray01 wrote:And here I've wondered why I choose to stay in lurker mode on this site, only for the two of you to come out and show me the reason.

and HQ is better of for it.
I would say otherwise. Considering your very poor behavior as of lately, I'm surprised you haven't had the hammer of banning applied yet.

And with this, I take my leave of this thread and go back to being in the shadows.
See, why can't you just say ban hammer?

Re: Spring 2016 preliminary election results

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 10:42 pm
by Shutter
Image

Re: Spring 2016 preliminary election results

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 10:43 pm
by KDFire
^Ironically, I agree with this.
Capt K wrote:See, why can't you just say ban hammer?
I'm sure you wish you could use it on us, and just win this argument by default. You seemed to be pretty happy doing it when someone disagreed with you on the 171st server when it was the only active one.

Re: Spring 2016 preliminary election results

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 10:44 pm
by Capt K
KDFire wrote:I'm sure you wish you could use it on us, and just win this argument by default. You seemed to be pretty happy doing it when someone disagreed with you on the 171st server when it was the only active one.
Who the actual fuck do you think I am?

Re: Spring 2016 preliminary election results

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 10:46 pm
by KDFire
Capt K wrote:
KDFire wrote:I'm sure you wish you could use it on us, and just win this argument by default. You seemed to be pretty happy doing it when someone disagreed with you on the 171st server when it was the only active one.
Who the actual fuck do you think I am?
Either Varren or one of the 171st in dimly-masqueraded form. It's not rocket science, silly.

Re: Spring 2016 preliminary election results

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 10:47 pm
by Capt K
KDFire wrote:Either Varren or one of the 171st in dimly-masqueraded form. It's not rocket science, silly.
I'm Nath you fucking idiot.

Re: Spring 2016 preliminary election results

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 10:49 pm
by KDFire
Capt K wrote:
KDFire wrote:Either Varren or one of the 171st in dimly-masqueraded form. It's not rocket science, silly.
I'm Nath you fucking idiot.
Yeahhhh, okay. Nice sockpuppet you've got going on there.

By the way, what's this?

Re: Spring 2016 preliminary election results

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2016 10:57 pm
by ksh
Capt K and KDfire...cut it out! this is not the kind of behaviour we want in our comunity! i dont care who said what! just cut it out!

OH btw! take a good look at 1 and 2 if you please!
app.php/rules