- Staff Chief
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2012 3:31 pm
- Favorite Aircraft: All of them.
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 78 times
After some discussion and review from your elected staff this semester, we have decided that due to increasing internet speeds worldwide, and increasing screen sizes, we will now allow avatars to be a minimum of 16px by 16px, and a maximum of 320px by 240px.
It is Flakes personal understanding that this will not affect visibility of the forum, but it will add a slight amount of bandwidth increase for users as they cache the larger avatars some members may choose to add. This increase should be a one off, as the image would be stored in your image cache on your local PC.
Of course, the Admin team are welcoming and accepting of your feedback on this change. We hope it will be welcomed.
Your Elected Staff Team, Semester 1, 2017.
Administrative / Official Account
- Posts: 1184
- Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2015 9:27 am
- Favorite Aircraft: Antonov An-225 Mriya
- Location: Ukraine
- OS: Linux
- Has thanked: 662 times
- Been thanked: 267 times
Please, add two more rules:YSFHQ wrote:Previously, avatars were a minimum of 20px by 20px, and a maximum of 150px by 150px. This policy has existed since the 2007 YSPilots days. After some discussion and review from your elected staff this semester, we have decided that due to increasing internet speeds worldwide, and increasing screen sizes, we will now allow avatars to be a minimum of 16px by 16px, and a maximum of 320px by 240px.
- only JPG and PNG files supported - do not use animated GIF (because it could be more than few megabytes with 150x150 resolution);
- avatar must be uploaded directly on YSFHQ (no any URL links to 3rd party websites);
- Posts: 4251
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 8:47 pm
- Favorite Aircraft: Honda CBR1000RR (2004).
- Location: Australia
- OS: Windows 10 (x64)
- Has thanked: 808 times
- Been thanked: 1157 times
Gifs aren't THAT bad. I understand you may be negatively affected by this personally u2fly due to your specific internet restrictions, I have had the thought. That said, I don't believe we should limit the usage just to appease the very few.
The current bandwidth use should go up by no more than 3 times pro-rata usage. Personally I like the gifs and would prefer more people use them, they look nice!
As for hosting only on HQ, doesn't make sense - other hosts are far faster than HQ, have a lot more bandwidth/storage space to share.
If gifs are bad for you, you can add an extension to your browser to disable the loading of GIFs.
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/deta ... balb?hl=en
^^ This extension intercepts the HTTP request for the GIF image and replaces it with a still image of just the first frame, news I think will be very welcome to you.
- Posts: 784
- Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2015 7:51 pm
- Favorite Aircraft: Mig-21
- Location: The Mün
- OS: Windows 10 Home
- Has thanked: 83 times
- Been thanked: 289 times
There's also the problem that when everyone uploads images directly to HQ it causes issues because websites only have so much space alloted to them, so linking images to third party websites helps to alleviate these restrictions.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest