Squad combat stagnation
- Midnight Rambler
- Staff
- Posts: 2136
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 11:08 pm
- Favorite Aircraft: F-16
- Location: Australia
- OS: Windows 11
- Has thanked: 267 times
- Been thanked: 374 times
Re: Squad combat stagnation
- Bombcat
- Staff
- Posts: 935
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 3:08 am
- Favorite Aircraft: F-14D Tomcat
- Location: Virginia
- OS: Windows 7
- Has thanked: 139 times
- Been thanked: 139 times
- Contact:
Re: Squad combat stagnation
As for Prince Darkstar's input - I am aware that he is not the only one who has a negative view of squadrons and their servers, but his complaints point to everything wrong with our community for quite some time. There should definitely be servers that facilitate different styles of play - combat, civilian, and a largely harmonious mix. As small as our community is, there is still no reason we should voluntarily limit ourselves to one or two servers, or a single type of server. And yes, I believe that some folks simply won't be welcome on certain servers, and would do well to stay away. This is not looking to any one person's experiences - people have been horrible in the past on all sides of this issue, but accepting stagnation, or death, because activity is not always positive for everyone is not the answer.
Team Awesome # 23
YSFHQ administrator.
- Margatroid
- CVW-171
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2014 5:14 pm
- Favorite Aircraft: F-14D
- Has thanked: 97 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
- Contact:
Re: Squad combat stagnation
so basically, youre saying you want the entirety of squad combat, one of the most pivotal parts of YS, to stay dead... ...because you had a bad experience with one squad (a squad which is now basically dead in the water so to speak)?PR1NC3 D4RK5T4R wrote:I'm just gonna say something here.
Encouraging the return of combat YS is essentially saying that you want things to be violent again. You're saying that you want squad wars...really? Or even worse, squad servers...
I have a little story about squad servers...
Flash back to 2011-early 2012 (and bear in mind, this was when I was only 11, and I knew very little about aircraft and how they worked). The 171st server was the most active on YS at the time, with Fariiniq and Eric running close behind.
After being trolled with a lot on Fariiniq's server, one day I had decided I had had it, and went on a rampage with Major's UFO, obliterating the server.
Soon after the 171st sees this, and boom, I'm officially hated for releasing my anger on them. Mid-2011 rolls by, and Gasman and his crew start tracking me down on the 171st server and start vulching/civ-killing/whatever in an attempt to run me out of YS. Through the whole shit fest, Iceman and the rest of the 171st don't even try to help. No, they join in fucking around with me, adding onto the growing hate I had for the 171st, and YS in general.
I only found peace when that godforsaken server was overtaken by 42south and shut down.
Jump forward to now, and we finally have some sort of peace with the death of combat YS in general. Except for the occasional rule breakers, its been smooth jazz.
The return of squad-operated servers like the 171st is something that I'm not sticking around for. Do one thing wrong and you'll be at your wits' end with the shitstorm.
okay, yeah sure, me and the other 171st did kill you a lot on the servers, but you probably wont see that nowadays because nearly the entire squad, including Ice, have left YS. As far as I know, Bombcat, Doomsday and Copperhead are the only ones still in and knowing the 171st well, I can say those three are quite tranquil compared to Ice and his gang. And don't bother pointing out that im here, because i left the 171st a year ago.
yeah im gonna be completely honest.. i dont know either, but i would say its best to start things off a new (ie new squads need to take the initiative instead of the 171st, 49th and RPFS, and those three names need to stay on the sidelines or stay dead). at least the 323rd and 57th exist though. if 57th bothers building up we might see some activity between the two squads.Midnight Rambler wrote:I think this thread has become a personification of the combat portion of YS. Plenty of talk about what's wrong with it, but no actual action about it. Also, I'm the first one to say that I have no answers, or any ability, to help fix the situation.
- David
- Modding Team
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 12:03 pm
- Favorite Aircraft: Grob G109B Vigilant
- Location: United Kingdom
- Has thanked: 191 times
- Been thanked: 141 times
Re: Squad combat stagnation
- Margatroid
- CVW-171
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2014 5:14 pm
- Favorite Aircraft: F-14D
- Has thanked: 97 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
- Contact:
Re: Squad combat stagnation
- David
- Modding Team
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 12:03 pm
- Favorite Aircraft: Grob G109B Vigilant
- Location: United Kingdom
- Has thanked: 191 times
- Been thanked: 141 times
Re: Squad combat stagnation
- Doomsday
- Staff
- Posts: 880
- Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2011 2:01 am
- Favorite Aircraft: PEW PEW PEW PEW
- Location: PEW PEW PEW
- OS: PEW PEW PEW PEW PEW
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 130 times
Re: Squad combat stagnation
Shutter, Bombcat and I tried having a system where there were two centralized teams consisting people from different squads, people not in squads, etc. and have them compete against each other in terms of A2A and A2G combat. Died due to lack of interest and not enough people (http://forum.ysfhq.com/viewtopic.php?f=139&t=4829)VNAF ONE wrote:Things like the blacklist are what we need more of. There needs to be more incentive for combat to exist. It used to be as simple a task as escorting a certain VA on their routes.
I tried starting up the blacklist, but quickly died due to lack of interest. (http://forum.ysfhq.com/viewtopic.php?f=139&t=5224)
Tried starting up Squad Wars, lack of interest. (http://forum.ysfhq.com/viewtopic.php?f=157&t=4489)
Bombcat and I created the Combat Reporting HQ, it was used frequently for the first several months when it was made, but now there hasn’t been a post there in almost 4 months. (http://forum.ysfhq.com/viewforum.php?f=244)
Kinda see a pattern?
Your behaviors flying around on a cheatplane on an IFF other than “1” is the fastest way to become extremely hated by many people. Especially the fact you attempted to be “server police” on the 171st server, you would sit on runways on an IFF other than “1” and your autogunners would pretty much vulch anyone who wasn’t on the same IFF as you. You even posted a “tribute video” of 9/11 which was only a 30 second video of you ramming a plane into a tower in a different flight sim. The 171st did not have any remorse for you when this Gasman showed up and gave you a taste of your own medicine.PR1NC3 D4RK5T4R wrote: Encouraging the return of combat YS is essentially saying that you want things to be violent again. You're saying that you want squad wars...really? Or even worse, squad servers...
I have a little story about squad servers...
Flash back to 2011-early 2012 (and bear in mind, this was when I was only 11, and I knew very little about aircraft and how they worked). The 171st server was the most active on YS at the time, with Fariiniq and Eric running close behind.
After being trolled with a lot on Fariiniq's server, one day I had decided I had had it, and went on a rampage with Major's UFO, obliterating the server.
Soon after the 171st sees this, and boom, I'm officially hated for releasing my anger on them. Mid-2011 rolls by, and Gasman and his crew start tracking me down on the 171st server and start vulching/civ-killing/whatever in an attempt to run me out of YS. Through the whole shit fest, Iceman and the rest of the 171st don't even try to help. No, they join in fucking around with me, adding onto the growing hate I had for the 171st, and YS in general.
The return of squad-operated servers like the 171st is something that I'm not sticking around for. Do one thing wrong and you'll be at your wits' end with the shitstorm.
On a personal note, if you people do wish for combat to gain some traction again, start posting in combat related threads. When more people see that there are people fighting on the servers, it will give them incentives to join the fight. When there is no activity on YSFHQ towards combat, then everyone has the mindset that combat is dead. Want combat to come back? Then you will have to do more than just going on the servers, shooting at a couple people and ground targets and think that’s it.
PEW PEW PEW PEW PEW PEW PEW PEW PEW PEW PEW PEW PEW PEW PEW PEW PEW PEW
Team Awesome# 131
- Shiny Rice
- 57th Polyvalent Sq
- Posts: 1388
- Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2011 3:28 pm
- Favorite Aircraft: Su-35
- Has thanked: 28 times
- Been thanked: 43 times
Re: Squad combat stagnation
"We rip those clouds apart so you can see the sun!"
Now 100% more decomissioned!
- Darris XTMRage
- Banned
- Posts: 223
- Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2012 12:51 am
- Favorite Aircraft: Embraer ERJ-145
- Location: KNBG
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Been thanked: 6 times
Re: Squad combat stagnation
Try not to be a total asshat on a server that has cheatplanes installed. I hear it stops people from going on rampages.Doomsday wrote:Your behaviors flying around on a cheatplane on an IFF other than “1” is the fastest way to become extremely hated by many people.
Refer to said reply above. Also, ever thought of changing IFFs and taking down the cheatplane yourself?Doomsday wrote:Especially the fact you attempted to be “server police” on the 171st server, you would sit on runways on an IFF other than “1” and your autogunners would pretty much vulch anyone who wasn’t on the same IFF as you.
You have to be an idiot to be able to call a recreation video a "tribute video".Doomsday wrote:You even posted a “tribute video” of 9/11 which was only a 30 second video of you ramming a plane into a tower in a different flight sim.
Wow, you think.Doomsday wrote:The 171st did not have any remorse for you when this Gasman showed up and gave you a taste of your own medicine.
As for the actual topic at hand: I really don't care about combat YS, as I'm mostly a civilian pilot. I can't really see a real use for combat squads except for things like combat training.
Chatzy wrote: [TR]Kilo-Delta-Foxtrot: how do I make my computer less laggy
[TR]HawkbitAlpha: close out any processes you aren't using
[TR]Kilo-Delta-Foxtrot has left the chat room
- Margatroid
- CVW-171
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2014 5:14 pm
- Favorite Aircraft: F-14D
- Has thanked: 97 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
- Contact:
Re: Squad combat stagnation
Darris XTMRage wrote:Good lord. I thought I could finally leave this place, but it seems this is going to become a TR-171st/TA/whatever matter...
Try not to be a total asshat on a server that has cheatplanes installed. I hear it stops people from going on rampages.Doomsday wrote:Your behaviors flying around on a cheatplane on an IFF other than “1” is the fastest way to become extremely hated by many people.
Refer to said reply above. Also, ever thought of changing IFFs and taking down the cheatplane yourself?Doomsday wrote:Especially the fact you attempted to be “server police” on the 171st server, you would sit on runways on an IFF other than “1” and your autogunners would pretty much vulch anyone who wasn’t on the same IFF as you.
You have to be an idiot to be able to call a recreation video a "tribute video".Doomsday wrote:You even posted a “tribute video” of 9/11 which was only a 30 second video of you ramming a plane into a tower in a different flight sim.
Wow, you think.Doomsday wrote:The 171st did not have any remorse for you when this Gasman showed up and gave you a taste of your own medicine.
[imgnores]http://inkslingerblog.files.wordpress.c ... ughter.gif[/imgnores]
then what are you even doing in this topic? what happens here has absolutely nothing to do with civilian YS, will not affect civilian YS in any way and should not concern you.Darris XTMRage wrote:As for the actual topic at hand: I really don't care about combat YS, as I'm mostly a civilian pilot. I can't really see a real use for combat squads except for things like combat training.
- Midnight Rambler
- Staff
- Posts: 2136
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 11:08 pm
- Favorite Aircraft: F-16
- Location: Australia
- OS: Windows 11
- Has thanked: 267 times
- Been thanked: 374 times
Re: Squad combat stagnation
Zip it. Your assumption doesn't really do anything for the conversation and you're baiting for a response.Darris XTMRage wrote:Good lord. I thought I could finally leave this place, but it seems this is going to become a TR-171st/TA/whatever matter...
That's just a positive feedback loop. You're creating more stimulus and a proportionately bigger response. There should be no reason to hover above a STP and shoot people 'for the lolz'. You just ruin the game for a lot of other people.Darris XTMRage wrote:Try not to be a total asshat on a server that has cheatplanes installed. I hear it stops people from going on rampages.Doomsday wrote:Your behaviors flying around on a cheatplane on an IFF other than “1” is the fastest way to become extremely hated by many people.
The whole term cheatplane is there for a reason. Who wants to chase the UFO, be killed many times, and finally kill it only to have it spawn 2 seconds later. That plane in particular is bad because of the auto gunner and huge speed. Essentially anyone could grab it and kill an entire server.Darris XTMRage wrote:Refer to said reply above. Also, ever thought of changing IFFs and taking down the cheatplane yourself?Doomsday wrote:Especially the fact you attempted to be “server police” on the 171st server, you would sit on runways on an IFF other than “1” and your autogunners would pretty much vulch anyone who wasn’t on the same IFF as you.
I've never seen it, but some people may find it distasteful. Such an iconic event can have very varied responses to those that experienced it.Darris XTMRage wrote:You have to be an idiot to be able to call a recreation video a "tribute video".Doomsday wrote:You even posted a “tribute video” of 9/11 which was only a 30 second video of you ramming a plane into a tower in a different flight sim.
If you have no use for combat squads, then don't post your distaste in a topic dedicated to restoring them. The idea of this topic isn't to vote on whether we want them back or not... We do want them back. So unless you have ideas to help bring them back, or what went wrong in the first place, then leave.Darris XTMRage wrote:Wow, you think.Doomsday wrote:The 171st did not have any remorse for you when this Gasman showed up and gave you a taste of your own medicine.
As for the actual topic at hand: I really don't care about combat YS, as I'm mostly a civilian pilot. I can't really see a real use for combat squads except for things like combat training.
- Copperhead
- Veteran
- Posts: 1164
- Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 7:00 pm
- Favorite Aircraft: YF-23A Black Widow II
- Location: Alabama
- OS: Windows 10 now.
- Has thanked: 438 times
- Been thanked: 136 times
Re: Squad combat stagnation
Darris XTMRage wrote:Good lord. I thought I could finally leave this place, but it seems this is going to become a TR-171st/TA/whatever matter...
Uhhhh.... why haven't you tried to leave?... Seems to me like you stick around just to put your negative/pointless 2 cents in every chance you get...
^The Happy Murican^
<BoH
- Alpha Star
- Modding Team
- Posts: 1202
- Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2011 5:26 pm
- Favorite Aircraft: One of them
- Location: The nearest gliding club, or a pub
- Has thanked: 113 times
- Been thanked: 326 times
Re: Squad combat stagnation
- Philster
- Veteran
- Posts: 558
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 11:57 pm
- Favorite Aircraft: Boeing 747
- Location: California
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 60 times
Re: Squad combat stagnation
I was always a combat pilot, and the main reason why I, and I'm sure many others, became less active was due to the fact things got boring. The only squads that had any skill in my opinion was the 171st, and they realized this. Instead of joining the 171st, I was encouraged to join the 241st to try and balance out the indifference in skill that existed between the squad. Nevertheless, the 241st pretty much dead when I joined. After Vincent left, things fell apart as we tried to get a new leader for the squad.
From what I've seen since during my time on ysflight, no squad has been able to match the skill and activity of the 171st. The 49th had many good pilots, but the only people I saw on the servers were Waspe and Sanderson. As FAVA made an appearance, and eventually the 323rd that followed, there was a massive influx in pilots. The 323rd soon rivaled the size of the 171st, but they were miles behind in skill. Yes, flying with others can be fun, but when every flight is complete domination on your end, things get boring.Rise and Shine wrote:Well. I'll get on with recruiting so we can have some proper battles.
So my take on this? Instead of arguing over who gets who, or that fact the 323rd may have a monopoly on pilots, increase your skill level. Why were people so eager to join the 171st? Because they offered a tight knit group that you could have fun with, and were exceptionally good pilots. People will want to join if you can offer more. Make yourself more appealing by offering better training to increase their combat skills. And please, don't just recruit people just to get more members. At least make sure they a mature enough to not damage the image of your squadron.
The best experience I had in ysflight was flying with the 171st late at night. They took on ground targets together as a team, and when dog fighting, actually put up a challenge.
As for this comment
Someone willing to take out the super burkes?Rise and Shine wrote:AI aircraft and ground targets? Please. Only real people can truly challenge real people.
241st Shadow Hunter
Team Awesome # 241
Soji wrote:They were the last birds who could have been arrested for the criminal negligence.
- Margatroid
- CVW-171
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2014 5:14 pm
- Favorite Aircraft: F-14D
- Has thanked: 97 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
- Contact:
Re: Squad combat stagnation
lol those things were rad. only ground target worth fighting imo.Philster wrote:Someone willing to take out the super burkes?Rise and Shine wrote:AI aircraft and ground targets? Please. Only real people can truly challenge real people.
- Midnight Rambler
- Staff
- Posts: 2136
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 11:08 pm
- Favorite Aircraft: F-16
- Location: Australia
- OS: Windows 11
- Has thanked: 267 times
- Been thanked: 374 times
- Flake
- VFA-49
- Posts: 4375
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 8:47 pm
- Favorite Aircraft: Boeing F/A-18A
- Location: Australia
- OS: Windows 10 (x64)
- Has thanked: 861 times
- Been thanked: 1279 times
- Contact:
Re: Squad combat stagnation
- Welshy
- Staff
- Posts: 2042
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 4:53 pm
- Favorite Aircraft: Sea Jet
- Location: Wales
- OS: Windows NT
- Has thanked: 249 times
- Been thanked: 254 times
- Contact:
Re: Squad combat stagnation
Overlord of VMFA-125 (CVW-171)
Previously Supreme Overlord of 323rd CAW
Friendly Neighbourhood Miscreant
Head Honcho at Talking Aero and British Defence
If you see me post like this in a thread pay attention!
- Shiny Rice
- 57th Polyvalent Sq
- Posts: 1388
- Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2011 3:28 pm
- Favorite Aircraft: Su-35
- Has thanked: 28 times
- Been thanked: 43 times
Re: Squad combat stagnation
Sorry, but we are actually mature enough. I don't admit anyone. Hell, I think Simon is in his thirties. And he's getting better. Those things haven't been in servers for ages. So my point is still valid. I'd love that you'd prove me wrong though, I really want to fight one of those.Philster wrote:So my take on this? Instead of arguing over who gets who, or that fact the 323rd may have a monopoly on pilots, increase your skill level. Why were people so eager to join the 171st? Because they offered a tight knit group that you could have fun with, and were exceptionally good pilots. People will want to join if you can offer more. Make yourself more appealing by offering better training to increase their combat skills. And please, don't just recruit people just to get more members. At least make sure they a mature enough to not damage the image of your squadron.
Someone willing to take out the super burkes?Rise and Shine wrote:AI aircraft and ground targets? Please. Only real people can truly challenge real people.
"We rip those clouds apart so you can see the sun!"
Now 100% more decomissioned!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests