mis·cel·la·ne·a - pl.n.: Miscellaneous items or written works collected together.
- Honey Badger
- 57th Polyvalent Sq
- Posts: 1843
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 8:17 pm
- Favorite Aircraft: Anything that gets off the ground
- Location: From Louisiana, stationed in Alabama
- Has thanked: 226 times
- Been thanked: 69 times
Personally, I'm going to stick with Windows 7. Windows looks pretty but the whole start page thing is fairly user unfriendly if use a computer as much as I do. It think that it'll be nearly useless for any kind of gaming or in depth computing. I may consider it if an option is made a available to disable the new start page and just use the desktop, however, it looks just Windows 7 at that point. I'm going to keep my fingers crossed that Microsoft follows their recent pattern: every other release the good one and the others just suck.
- Senior Veteran
- Posts: 1773
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 8:47 am
- Favorite Aircraft: Sukhoi Su-30MKM
- Location: Somewhere in Asia
- OS: Windows 10
- Has thanked: 834 times
- Been thanked: 191 times
Mein Imgur gallery. Feel free to use any of my screenshots (Crediting me is optional, but greatly appreciated)
- Shiny Rice
- 57th Polyvalent Sq
- Posts: 1389
- Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2011 3:28 pm
- Favorite Aircraft: Su-35
- Has thanked: 28 times
- Been thanked: 42 times
I know, XP is FTW. But when it hangs, it hangs forever. I'm going to get W7, at last a new OS.Crazypilot wrote:xp, muthafuckas.
"We rip those clouds apart so you can see the sun!"
Now 100% more decomissioned!
- Posts: 2040
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 4:53 pm
- Favorite Aircraft: Sea Jet
- Location: Wales
- OS: Windows NT
- Has thanked: 247 times
- Been thanked: 249 times
I will be sticking to XP due to the fact I require stability for what I use my machine for. I am looking at getting a Mac but I will make sure I get a copy of XP on there (via Boot Camp )
- Posts: 548
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 1:46 am
- Favorite Aircraft: 767
- Location: Los Angeles
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 6 times
- Posts: 167
- Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2012 10:50 pm
- Favorite Aircraft: Saab Gripen
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 5 times
However, this guy makes a very good argument:
Original PostForty-Two wrote: As I have said before, Win8 is gonna fail hard. Why? Because it's designed for the tablet and smartphone world. Android and iOS are already entrenched there; anything else that isn't amazingly better will fail. Win8 cannot be amazingly better. Therefore, it will fail.
It will have a side effect, however. Desktop users will be alienated. Microsoft has already done this 2 times in the past, ME and Vista. They can't afford to do it again. Most of their profits come from their desktop OS market and their office market. Without their mainstay in the OS market, they will be unable to continue as a software company. All of their other products are copies of existing software, and have all suffered staggering losses.
There is another problem with Microsoft. They have poor leadership. Even if Gates was evil, he was still a programmer. He programmed at least 1 piece of commercially successful software (Altair Basic). Balmer, on the other hand, is an MBA. He has not programmed one piece of software in his life. He instituted stack ranking,
Kurt Eichenwald wrote:Every current and former Microsoft employee I interviewed—every one—cited stack ranking as the most destructive process inside of MicrosoftsourceIf you were on a team of 10 people, you walked in the first day knowing that, no matter how good everyone was, two people were going to get a great review, seven were going to get mediocre reviews, and one was going to get a terrible review
This caused projects at Microsoft to stagnate as they became entwined into an increasingly large bureaucracy that prevented actual work from happening. Projects like Windows Reader (Originally an eBook), Vista, and Zune, where Microsoft had several years on their competition ended up being released years later, stripped of features and far from their original purpose. There is no reason that win9 will be any different from win8.
I believe that in the next 5 years, users will be increasingly motivated to change OSs as Microsoft takes yet another plunge in their profits. There are currently 2 other viable options to windows: OS X and Linux (I refer to the FOSS BSDs in this statement as well, though they are not strictly linux). Although OS X has a large fanboy userbase, I do not see it gaining more than 5-10% over the next 5 years, as its overpriced hardware is not comparable to the many cheaper PC manufacturers' products. However, Linux has the power to take the computer world by the storm in the next 5 years, as its many variations form themselves against a unique subset of the computing world.
Linux has a large commercial userbase already, as many companies have searched for a more economically viable solution to windows in the post-recession world. According to two surveys by W3Tech and Security Space released in August 2011 and 2009, respectively, Linux now runs 63.9% or greater of all servers. According to a 2012 survey of companies with $500 million or more in revenues, almost 80% of them foresee an increase in linux usage in their company in the next 12 months, and 71.8% are planning to add more linux computers in order to support "Big Data."
The big obstacle we now face is widespread desktop adoption of linux. However, this may have already begun. Current articles place linux usage from 8-10% and growing (source source). With the failure of win8 eminent, we may finally see Linus's World Domination Plan put into effect.
- Business Class Membership
- Posts: 3224
- Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2011 6:17 pm
- Favorite Aircraft: Any thing with a prop.
- Location: New Iberia.LA.
- OS: Windows XP SP3
- Has thanked: 577 times
- Been thanked: 733 times
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests